Go to the plant
Every engineer visits production lines. You cannot build for a factory you have never stood in.
Hiring for cohort-one deployments
Most engineers never see their code change a physical object. Here, a model you ship on Tuesday adjusts a foaming shot on Thursday and shows up as fewer warranty claims two years later.
Takt time does not negotiate. If a decision takes 140 milliseconds and the station allows 100, the decision does not exist.
The factory network will drop. The lighting will change between shifts. A new product variant will arrive with no labelled data. A press will be replaced with a different model and the same agent must keep working.
And once the system can write to equipment, every bug is a physical event. That constraint makes the engineering better.
All roles are hands-on. There is no layer of people here who only talk about the work.
Own the on-premise runtime: deterministic scheduling, GPU inference serving, connector transports and fail-safe behaviour when the network disappears.
EngineeringBuild the models that see enamel defects, foam distribution, connector seating and leak signatures — and know when they are uncertain.
EngineeringPanel handling, sim-to-real transfer and digital-twin fidelity good enough to gate a production change.
EngineeringOrchestration, evidence chains, confidence calibration and the evaluation harness that decides what is allowed to ship.
FieldLive inside customer plants. Own the written success metric, the baseline and the pilot from shadow to advisory.
PlatformCloud control plane, signed edge OTA, multi-tenant isolation and the release path from CI to canary line.
Six rules that decide arguments.
Every engineer visits production lines. You cannot build for a factory you have never stood in.
Baseline first, always. Unmeasured improvement is a story, not a result.
Fail-safe behaviour, bounded authority and reversibility are decided at design time, not patched in later.
One line, one workflow, one metric. Breadth without a proven wedge is how platforms die.
Decisions, caveats and failure modes get documented. Institutional memory is a competitive advantage.
The person on the line knows things the model does not. Their correction is a signal, not an inconvenience.
Seven stage agents, a factory orchestrator, a digital twin and an assurance layer — running at the edge, inside real plants, under real takt time.
Four steps, roughly two weeks, no take-home that takes your weekend.
Thirty minutes with an engineer about what you have built and what you want to build next.
A real problem from our backlog, discussed the way we would discuss it internally.
Design something under physical constraints — latency, safety, offline operation, reversibility.
Meet the people you would work with, and ask us the hard questions about a pre-launch company.
Stated honestly for a pre-launch company.
“Our end-of-line functional testers told us what failed. They never told us which press stroke or foam shot caused it. That link is the whole product.”
“Foam voids are invisible until the energy rating comes back wrong. Predicting density distribution before the cabinet cures is the part I could not buy anywhere else.”
“If it writes to the press, it needs an audit trail a quality auditor accepts. Duromex started there instead of bolting it on.”
So there are no surprises.
plant visits per quarter, typical
the budget your code lives inside
autonomy levels you must design for
features that ship without an eval
…you want to work exclusively on models and never think about a PLC. …you prefer a clean abstraction boundary between your code and the physical world. …you want a mature product with a stable roadmap.
You will probably love it if you have ever stood on a factory floor and thought: this could all be so much better.
For engineering roles, no — curiosity about the physical process matters more. For the forward-deployed process engineer role, yes, appliance or automotive plant experience is essential.
Remote-friendly, but not remote-only. Regular plant time is part of every engineering role.
Write to us anyway with what you would build here. A specific, opinionated message beats a generic application every time.
Tell us what you would build on an appliance line and why.
Duromex is pre-launch. Figures shown are design-partner targets and modelled economics, not audited results. Ask us for the methodology.