Hiring for cohort-one deployments

Software thatmoves steel,not pixels.

Most engineers never see their code change a physical object. Here, a model you ship on Tuesday adjusts a foaming shot on Thursday and shows up as fewer warranty claims two years later.

6
open roles
100%
of engineers visit plants
3
days to a decision after final round
1
written success metric per team

What is genuinely hard here

Takt time does not negotiate. If a decision takes 140 milliseconds and the station allows 100, the decision does not exist.

The factory network will drop. The lighting will change between shifts. A new product variant will arrive with no labelled data. A press will be replaced with a different model and the same agent must keep working.

And once the system can write to equipment, every bug is a physical event. That constraint makes the engineering better.

Problems on the board right now

  • Sub-100ms multi-camera fusion on edge GPUs
  • Few-shot defect learning for new product variants
  • Foam density inference from indirect process signals
  • Micro-leak signatures below tester detection thresholds
  • Sim-to-real transfer for robotic panel handling
  • Provable authority envelopes for equipment writes

How we work

Six rules that decide arguments.

Go to the plant

Every engineer visits production lines. You cannot build for a factory you have never stood in.

Measure before you claim

Baseline first, always. Unmeasured improvement is a story, not a result.

Safety is a design input

Fail-safe behaviour, bounded authority and reversibility are decided at design time, not patched in later.

Ship narrow, then deepen

One line, one workflow, one metric. Breadth without a proven wedge is how platforms die.

Write it down

Decisions, caveats and failure modes get documented. Institutional memory is a competitive advantage.

Respect the operator

The person on the line knows things the model does not. Their correction is a signal, not an inconvenience.

The system you would be working on

Seven stage agents, a factory orchestrator, a digital twin and an assurance layer — running at the edge, inside real plants, under real takt time.

Form & stampWeld & seamEnamel & paintFoam & insulateWire & assembleLeak & function testRate & pack
PASS · A+++ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

How hiring works

Four steps, roughly two weeks, no take-home that takes your weekend.

Intro call

Thirty minutes with an engineer about what you have built and what you want to build next.

Technical deep dive

A real problem from our backlog, discussed the way we would discuss it internally.

System design

Design something under physical constraints — latency, safety, offline operation, reversibility.

Team and values

Meet the people you would work with, and ask us the hard questions about a pre-launch company.

What we offer

Stated honestly for a pre-launch company.

Equity
Meaningful equity — early team, real ownership
Ways of working
Remote-friendly with regular on-site plant time; the plant visits are not optional
Hardware
Edge GPU development hardware and access to real line data from design partners
Learning
Conference budget, and a strong bias towards publishing the engineering we can publish
Stage risk
We are pre-launch. Revenue is not yet proven and the roadmap will change. We will not pretend otherwise in an interview

What partners say about the work

“Our end-of-line functional testers told us what failed. They never told us which press stroke or foam shot caused it. That link is the whole product.”

Plant Director
Refrigeration OEM · design partner Illustrative

“Foam voids are invisible until the energy rating comes back wrong. Predicting density distribution before the cabinet cures is the part I could not buy anywhere else.”

Process Engineer
Cabinet line · design partner Illustrative

“If it writes to the press, it needs an audit trail a quality auditor accepts. Duromex started there instead of bolting it on.”

Quality & Test Engineer
Laundry OEM · design partner Illustrative

What the job actually involves

So there are no surprises.

~2

plant visits per quarter, typical

<100 ms

the budget your code lives inside

3

autonomy levels you must design for

0

features that ship without an eval

You will probably dislike this if…

…you want to work exclusively on models and never think about a PLC. …you prefer a clean abstraction boundary between your code and the physical world. …you want a mature product with a stable roadmap.

You will probably love it if you have ever stood on a factory floor and thought: this could all be so much better.

You will fit if

  • You are comfortable being measured on a plant's metric
  • You think latency budgets are interesting, not annoying
  • You would rather ship one proven thing than five demos
  • You are happy to be wrong in front of a process engineer

Before you apply

Do I need appliance-manufacturing experience?

For engineering roles, no — curiosity about the physical process matters more. For the forward-deployed process engineer role, yes, appliance or automotive plant experience is essential.

Is this remote?

Remote-friendly, but not remote-only. Regular plant time is part of every engineering role.

What if there is no role listed that fits me?

Write to us anyway with what you would build here. A specific, opinionated message beats a generic application every time.

Come build physical AI that ships.

Tell us what you would build on an appliance line and why.

Duromex is pre-launch. Figures shown are design-partner targets and modelled economics, not audited results. Ask us for the methodology.